EnigmA Amiga Run 1997 July/EnigmA AMIGA RUN 20 (1997)(G.R. Edizioni)(IT)[!][issue 1997-07 & 08][EAR-CD IV].iso/lightwave/lwmlist/95.lightwave-10/000621_owner-lightwav…mail.webcom.com_Wed Oct 11 08:37:16 1995.msg

Internet Message Format | 1995-11-07 | 2KB

Received: by mail.webcom.com
    (1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA040745836; Wed, 11 Oct 1995 08:37:16 -0700
Return-Path: <[e-mail]>
Received: from mail06.mail.aol.com by mail.webcom.com with ESMTP
    (1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA040685831; Wed, 11 Oct 1995 08:37:11 -0700
Received: by mail06.mail.aol.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) id LAA18738; Wed, 11 Oct 1995 11:29:51 -0400
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 1995 11:29:51 -0400
From: [e-mail]
Message-Id: <[e-mail]>
To: [e-mail]
Cc: [e-mail]
Subject: Re: Perception vs. Flyer
Sender: [e-mail]
Precedence: bulk

In a message dated 95-10-11 08:10:57 EDT, you write:

>What I really want to know  is how good the quality  is compared to the
>hQ5 of the Flyer. I was never able to do a proper side by side comparison.
>
>
>

The Flyer is good, but the Perception is the best dispay board I've seen. And
I have seen many. Media 100, Avid 8000, Avid 1000, VideoVision SStudio,
Telecast, The Cube, Fast Video Machine, Flyer. I have worked with, and used
all of these. Anytime you import and export your video signal in component,
CAV, your video will be much cleaner.

The Flyer works somewhat like the PAR when it comes to gradient color
spreads. In short, IT CREATERS! My evaluation is based on O-scope and
Vector/Waveform displays. Not, oh yeah, that looks better. The Flyer is an
offline/Industrial editor, with an interface that a drunk, one armed monkey
could use. It's great for what it was intended for. But the HIGH END will
demand component video, and if you want to work for them you'll need to
provide it.

Tom Rennen
Intelligent Light Digital Imaging
214-420-6815



--
[e-mail] sent this message.
To Post a Message           : [e-mail]
Un/Subscription Requests To : [e-mail]
(DIGEST)                 or : [e-mail]
Administrative Items To     : [e-mail]